Petar Jovic vs Alexey Shtengelov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Both Jovic and Shtengelov have struggled significantly with their second serve performance in the last six months, each winning 0% of points. How does this affect their chances? Such statistics often correlate highly with match prediction accuracy.
• In terms of return game stats, Jovic has similarly struggled, winning 0% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form. Shtengelov’s performance mirrors that of Jovic, also winning 0%. The numbers on first serve returns are equally low, at 0% for both players.
• Under pressure, neither player stands out, with Jovic failing to save any breakpoints recently and Shtengelov sharing the same weakness. This can be crucial for in-game betting predictions.
• Looking at the performance overview for the past year, Jovic has won 28.57% of his matches, whereas Shtengelov has a lower win rate at 18.75%.
• Which surfaces suit these players best? Jovic favors Grass (50% win rate), while Clay is his least successful surface. Shtengelov performs better on Indoor Hard courts (33%), with a poor record on Grass.
• Both players have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments over the past year, with Jovic achieving a slightly better win rate (28.57%) than Shtengelov (18.75%).
• Jovic tends to face higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 84.14. In contrast, Shtengelov's opponents average a much lower rank of 241.88.
• In deciding sets, Jovic has not managed any victories over the past year, while Shtengelov has clinched 100% of such situations. Could this give Shtengelov a deciding edge?
• Both players have failed to convert any breakpoint opportunities recently, with conversion rates sitting at 0% for each. This could be a key factor during live betting.
• Analyzing current event head-to-head stats is also vital, as certain players might perform better in specific events, potentially influencing the outcome.

Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):

Given the statistics outlined, both Jovic and Shtengelov appear to have significant weaknesses, especially concerning their serve performance and ability to convert breakpoints. Neither player has demonstrated a decisive edge in recent form. However, while Jovic has faced tougher competition, his overall match win percentage is slightly superior to that of Shtengelov.

Jovic's best-suited surface is Grass, which might not be a factor if the match takes place on a different surface. On the other hand, Shtengelov's exceptional performance in deciding sets signifies resilience under pressure, a distinguishing factor in close matches.

When predicting the likely winner of this match, Shtengelov's capability to prevail in deciding sets could be crucial. Therefore, Shtengelov may be slightly more favored to win this upcoming tennis match, despite both players’ overall difficulties.